Monday, September 14, 2015

The Evolution of Unmanned Aerial Systems


Blog Post #1

ASCI 530 – Unmanned Aerospace Systems

 

The Evolution of Unmanned Aerial Systems

 

    Like so many boys growing up I had a keen interest in model airplanes.  Cutting little plastic parts, and gluing them together to marvel at a replica of an admired piece of engineering genius.  That led the way to fly by wire model planes, and the ever “cool” Estes model rockets with their solid propellant, size A, B, C, and D engines; some even double stage.  Later, when my budget allowed (or rather my parent’s budget would allow), I graduated to remotely controlled vehicles.  So went my evolution with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV).  Today that interest carries over to my professional life where I get to research, and be involved in the development of real Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs), and the ground elements that are used to operate them remotely.

    As a kid I thought Radio Control (RC) was cutting edge technology, but if that were true I’d have to be over a 100 years old today.  For the record, I am not.  Several technological obstacles have stood in the way of the advancement of the UAS, guidance systems and control of those systems likely being the most obvious.  The United States first began exploring the utility of UAS during World War 1 but those efforts were plagued by the unavailability of a reliable guidance system (Zaloga, 2008, p 4).  In 1909, American inventor Elmer Sperry began designing gyroscopic devices to control the stability of aircraft.  That led the way for the modern Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) in use today.   (Zaloga, 2008, P6).

    Navigational systems is just one milestone in the evolution of the UAS.  Others have been the improvements in remote communications most notably through satellite communications which allow pilots to “fly” those aircraft from thousands of miles away, replacing the radio control first introduced to the United States Navy in the 1930s by Reginald Denny of the hobby industry, and his Radioplane company.  Mr. Denny developed several versions of his model, the RP-1 through the RP-19/OQ-19 over several years.  His Radioplane was acquired by Northrop Grumman and went on to form the core of one of the most successful of today’s UAV firms  (Zaloga, 2008, P 7).

    Greater distances between aircraft and control site necessitates an accurate reporting of the aircrafts location when beyond line of sight, usually via GPS reporting.  No matter how reliable a control channels may be, it’s absolutely imperative that some safety measures be in place in the event of a communications system failure.  A modern UAS needs some degree of autonomy.  In the more sophisticated aircraft, that is achieved through on board mission management computer systems which have flight plans loaded so if communications  are lost, the aircraft can still execute preprogrammed instructions, allowing it to Return to Base (RTB), land safely, or proceed to a preestablished way point in its flight plan in the hopes of reestablishing control and communications.    Many control agencies, including the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) already insist upon a Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) before they will allow an aircraft to transit over a populated area, or within their airspace.  That will surely extend to the UAS as well.  The mindset of “big sky, little bullet” is not, nor should it ever be, acceptable.   The refinement of existing TCAS is likely to further the advancement, and prevalence of UASs in the skies above us.  UASs have come a long way from Reginald Denny’s Radioplane, largely in part due to the advancement in satellite communications providing that means of control, as well as enabling the UAS to be a platform for various payloads including sophisticated Electro-Optical systems, such as that integrated in Boeing’s ScanEagle, initially designed for the commercial fishing industry, and later used by the military as an observation platform, proving UAVs have a much greater utility than as simple targeting drones (Boeing, 9/2015).

    To the uninformed, UASs present a danger to our population, but I would argue that the systems in use, and those in development today are, and will continue to be, tremendously valuable tools, furthering our ability to fight fires, conduct search and rescue operations, extend communications, conduct terrain mapping, and will have countless other uses.  One thing is certain; UASs will continue to grow within the aviation community and even today we can look at them as the next big thing in a rapidly developing and exciting industry.

 

 

 

References

Zaloga, S. J.  (2008) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Robotic Air Warfare 1917 – 2007.  Osprey

     Publishing/Random House Distribution Center, Westminster, MD 21157

(Boeing, 9/2015) ScanEagle Unmanned Aerial Vehicle [online]. Available: http://www.boeing.com/history/products/scaneagle-unmanned-aerial-vehicle.page

No comments:

Post a Comment