Monday, October 19, 2015

Unmanned Aircraft Use In Border Protection


Running head: Unmanned Aircraft Use In Border Protection

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unmanned Aircraft Use In Border Protection


Roy Sandridge


Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University – Worldwide


6.4 – Research: UAS Mission


Abstract


The use of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) is on the rise across America and is gaining popularity beyond the hobbyist, and modeler.  UAS has been effectively used by the military for years, proving themselves as effective in aerial imagery, communications relay, and even weapons delivery.  The applications in commercial, law enforcement, and border protection use also continues to grow.  Closely relating to the proof of concept/employment provided by the military use, is the use by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection which has also found UAS to be ideal platforms for aerial survey, imagery, reconnaissance, intelligence, and surveillance.  This paper will look at the applications for which UAS have been employed and the benefits derived in keeping our borders safe, including but not limited to aerial survey, and drug interdiction.


Unmanned Aerial Systems in Border Protection


The Predator Choice


The MQ-9 Predator B has found itself in the inventory of the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).  Given the political and military conflicts that have become a normal part of daily news for so long, and the prominence of unmanned aircraft used in those conflicts, it’s may not be easy for anyone without a military background to imagine a non-destructive use for an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS).  The Predator however, may be ideally suited for the role of providing the surveillance needed.

 


Design And Implementation


The Predator has proven to be reliable and fault-tolerant, engineered to exceed the reliability standards in many capacities of manned aircraft.  Engine performance and fuel efficiency are provided by the Honeywell TPE331-10 turboprop engine, which has proved to be particularly efficient at low altitudes. The modular payload capability is easily reconfigured, making it capable of carrying Electro-Optical/Infrared (EO/IR) multi-mode radar, surveillance radar, and a variety of other sensors making it a highly capable platform.  Future designs will have extended wing spans of 79 feet allowing the aircraft to carry more fuel, and extending its flight time to as long as 42 hours. (General Atomics Aeronautical, n.d.).

 


Other platforms that could do the same job


  1.  The Northrop Grumman Global Hawk provides the same capability, but may be cost prohibitive. (Foxtrot Alpha, n.d.)
  2. MQ-8B has limited time on station making it impractical.(Northrop Grumman, n.d.)
  3. Solar powered aircraft are being developed, such as the one by Boeing Aerospace (Solar Eagle) and the Zephyr High Altitude Pseudo-Satellite (HAPS) UAS which carries an optical camera at altitudes around seventy thousand (70,000) feet, and these platforms may stay aloft for weeks, perhaps even years but this technology is still under development. (Boeing, n.d., and Airbus Defense and Space, nd.)

 

Considerations relative to the mission and they correlate to the performance of any related mission execution tasks


The decision makers in the U.S. government have a challenging task; patrolling the skies to prevent the illegal entry of weapon of terror, interdicting illegal narcotics, and preventing the illegal entry of undocumented persons into the United States (U.S. Customs and Border Protection, n.d.).  The question, is can something that is often misunderstood by so many as being lethal, be the right choice to accomplish that task.  What the opposition should realize is that the Predator wasn’t first designed to be a weapons delivery platform.  The inventor, Abraham Karem, had no intention of designing a weapons platform, but rather a platform for surveillance (Whittle, R., 4/2013).  The employment of the Predator with CBP is much more in line with what the inventor had envisioned.

Benefits and challenges associated with performing the particular UAS mission


The idea of using a remote sensing capability for border protection began in 1998, though at that time the idea was a ground-based “fence” called Integrated Surveillance Intelligence System (ISIS).  That project ultimately failed and the focus has shifted to using an aerial platform, which itself has had its share of difficulty.  About six months after the fist Predator was put into use by the CBP, the pilot of one of these aircraft belonging to CBP crashed it into a hillside after the engine was shut down in midflight.  Today, having overcome many of the initial challenges, the CBP maintains a fleet of nine Predator B UAS in three locations; Arizona, North Dakota. and Texas (Michel, A. H.,  1/7/15). 

Legal and or ethical challenges to the specific mission your are highlighting


The Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow the CBP UAV operations to exist, given that they have cognizance over the National Air Space.  At the same time, they restrict the use of UAS aircraft over populated areas.  A question for consideration might then be, if the goal of the Predator is to provide surveillance over an area where people might be trying to cross a remote area, and there is a concern that an unmanned aircraft might crash to the ground, is it ethical to put such an aircraft in that area?  In 2011 a professor at The University of Texas figured out how to intercept Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) while in flight (NPR, 7/8/15).  Given the possibility, even if it is remote, shouldn’t the FAA give consideration the danger?  Systems security should always be a factor when human lives, American or otherwise, are at risk.

A second consideration is that of privacy.  Border protection is a necessary part of our lives, given the many uncertainties in the world.  At least some consideration should be given to the capabilities presented when an UAS is flying overhead.  With the increasing use of UAS and the incredible high altitude surveillance capabilities they provide, should we all now assume that when we leave our homes, we are potentially being observed?  Have we given up any and all reasonable expectations of privacy outside our homes? 

 


References


Airbus Defense & Space, n.d., Retrieved 10/19/15, http://militaryaircraft-airbusds.com/Aircraft/UAV/Zephyr.aspx


 

 


General Atomics Aeronautical, n.d., Predator B, RPA, Retrieve from http://www.ga-asi.com/predator-b


Michel, A. H., (January 7, 2015), Center for the Study of the Drone, at Bard College, Retrived 10/19/15, http://dronecenter.bard.edu/customs-and-border-protection-drones/

NPR, 7/8/15, Hacking Drones and The Dangers It Presents, npr.org, Retrieved 10/19/15, http://www.npr.org/2012/07/08/156459939/hacking-drones-and-the-dangers-it-presents

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, n.d., Retrieved 10/19/15, http://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/documents/uas_prog_3.pdf

Whittle, R., (April, 2013), The Man Who Invented the Predator, Air & Space Magazine, Retrieved 10/19/15, http://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/the-man-who-invented-the-predator-3970502/?no-ist

No comments:

Post a Comment